Éditeur(s) : HAL CCSD Taylor & Francis
Résumé : International audience
Overfishing and habitat destruction due to local and global threats are undermining fisheries, biodiversity, and the long-term sustainability of tropical marine ecosystems worldwide, including in the Coral Triangle. Well-designed and effectively managed marine reserve networks can reduce local threats, and contribute to achieving multiple objectives regarding fisheries management, biodiversity conservation and adaptation to changes in climate and ocean chemistry. Previous studies provided advice regarding ecological guidelines for designing marine reserves to achieve one or two of these objectives. While there are many similarities in these guidelines, there are key differences that provide conflicting advice. Thus, there is a need to provide integrated guidelines for practitioners who wish to design marine reserves to achieve all three objectives simultaneously. Scientific advances regarding fish connectivity and recovery rates, and climate and ocean change vulnerability, also necessitate refining advice for marine reserve design. Here we review ecological considerations for marine reserve design, and provide guidelines to achieve all three objectives simultaneously regarding: habitat representation; risk spreading; protecting critical, special and unique areas; reserve size, spacing, location, and duration; protecting climate resilient areas; and minimizing and avoiding threats. In addition to applying ecological guidelines, reserves must be designed to address social and governance considerations, and be integrated within broader fisheries and coastal management regimes.
ISSN: 0892-0753

hal-01333534
https://hal-univ-perp.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01333534
DOI : 10.1080/08920753.2014.877763

Éditeur(s) : HAL CCSD
Résumé : Report
The primary research question being addressed is: What is the variability in water storage (seasonal, inter-annual) and what are the long-term trends in water storage for the Nelson River drainage basin of mid-continental North America? The answer to this question certainly varies over the Nelson River drainage basin, which includes the North and South Saskatchewan Rivers (which flow through an agriculturally productive but drought-vulnerable region) as well as the lower reaches of the Nelson River itself (which provide significant hydro-electricity).
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00856621

hal-00856621
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00856621

Éditeur(s) : HAL CCSD Elsevier
Résumé : International audience
Decreasing growth rate (Feeley et al., 2007) and large die-back due to drought (Phillips et al., 2009) suggest that tropical forests are suffering recent climate changes. Forest vulnerability to external factors (e.g. air pollution, acid rain) is widely studied in northern countries, while only a few attempts have investigated crown integrity in the Tropics. The method needs to be generic enough to account for the large number of species and crown shapes encountered in tropical forests. In the present study, we developed and tested a novel field method that estimates crown fragmentation (main branch mortality (MB) and secondary branch mortality (SB)), liana infestation (LI) and crown position (CP) in the canopy. The relationship between crown fragmentation and annual growth rate (agr) was investigated through multiple regression. Six out of eight canopy tree species showed significant growth decline with increasing crown fragmentation. Higher probability of death was also found in trees with severe crown fragmentation. The capacity of such crown assessment to depict tree vitality in a forest stand is discussed along with potential applications in both forest science and management
ISSN: 0378-1127

halsde-00611465
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halsde-00611465
DOI : 10.1016/j.foreco.2010.10.025

Éditeur(s) : HAL CCSD EDP Sciences
Résumé : International audience
This paper reports the first outcomes of a research program “Environment and Sustainable Development in the Caribbean space” co-funded by the European Union, the Région Martinique and the Université des Antilles et de la Guyane under the European Union operational programme 2007-2013. Since the middle of the last century, the Caribbean countries, regardless of their great diversity and political fragmentation, are faced with the recurring problem of development. Having explored different paths, they are looking now for new development models. This challenge which becomes obsessive over the decades, is now a major concern: indeed, the Caribbean territories are per se vulnerable and highly exposed to natural risks due to climate change. In addition, this relates to areas where tensions between exploitation and conservation of a rich biodiversity are particularly strong. Based on the promotion of tourism and services as part of an “open regionalism” at the intersection of global and local scales of public action, the current development strategies give rise to a dual approach with, however, rather mixed results: on the one hand, a discursive use of sustainable development, apprehended through its environmental dimension, evidences a new way of looking at the region and a change in the way the region sees itself; on the other hand, a political use of sustainable development through cross-cutting policies, is hindered by the complexity of structures, the multiple levels of action and regulation, and the difficult appropriation of public-policy organization by local communities and people.
Cet article rend compte des premiers résultats d’un programme de recherche « Environnement et développement durable dans l’espace caraïbe » cofinancé par l’Union européenne, la région Martinique et l’Université des Antilles et de la Guyane dans le cadre des programmes opérationnels européens 2007-2013. Il montre que les territoires de la Caraïbe, après avoir exploré plusieurs voies en matière de développement, privilégient désormais des stratégies axées sur le tourisme et les services. S’inscrivant dans un « régionalisme ouvert » au croisement des échelles globale et locale d’intervention en matière d’action publique, ces stratégies débouchent sur une double démarche aux résultats contrastés : d’un côté, une mise en discours du développement durable, appréhendé notamment à travers sa dimension environnementale, témoigne d’un changement de regard sur la région et de celle-ci sur elle-même ; de l’autre, une mise en politique du développement durable à travers des dispositifs à caractère transversal, se heurte à la complexité des structures, à la multiplicité des échelles d’intervention et de régulation ainsi qu’à la difficile appropriation desdits dispositifs par les populations locales.
ISSN: 1240-1307

Droits : info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess
hal-01675012
https://hal.univ-antilles.fr/hal-01675012
https://hal.univ-antilles.fr/hal-01675012/document
https://hal.univ-antilles.fr/hal-01675012/file/NSS_La%20mise%20en%20discours.pdf
DOI : 10.1051/nss/2015043

Éditeur(s) : Université des Antilles Études caribéennes
Résumé : La République des Seychelles constitue un archipel formé de quelque 115 petites îles situées dans l’océan Indien, totalisant 455 km² et s’étendant sur 1 200 km. Les trois plus grandes îles intérieures sont Mahé, Praslin et La Digue qui regroupent 95 % de la population. Les îles des Seychelles offrent en raison de leur situation géographique, de leurs particularités climatiques et de l’attractivité de leurs images de destinations touristiques, la possibilité de pratiquer dans des conditions optimales une grande diversité d’activités de tourisme et de sports de nature tout au long de l’année. Les randonnées pédestre et équestre, le VTT, l’escalade, le surf, la plongée, la voile et le canoë-kayak marquent de leurs empreintes cet archipel. L’objectif de cette réflexion est d'identifier la place des activités de sports de nature dans l’offre touristique des Seychelles et de voir dans quelle mesure elles peuvent contribuer au développement durable de l’île, notamment en tissant des relations avec l’activité économique, la structuration du territoire et la construction identitaire. L’enjeu de développement durable est-il pris en compte par les acteurs seychellois dans le domaine touristique ?
The Republic of Seychelles is made of more than 115 small islands in the Indian Ocean, with 455 km2 of land in a stretch of about 1200 km. The three biggest inner islands are Mahe, Praslin, and La Digue, which include about 95% of the population. The Seychelles islands give the possibility in optimal conditions a vast variety of tourism activities and nature sports all year long, due to their geographical situations, their geomorphological configurations, their climate particularities, and their attractive images of touristic destinations. Walking and equestrian trekking, mountain bike, climbing, surfing, diving, yachting, and canoe-kayaking are some activities available in this insular territory. Because of this exceptional potential, the development of “nature” sports is in the (universe) field of leisure and tourism. The objective of this study is to identify what place “nature” sport activities play in the tourism offer in the Seychelles. Don’t they contribute, in the long-term development of the islands by having relations more interactive with the economic activity, the territorial structure, and the identity construction? Is the outcome of long-term development taken seriously by the actors of Seychelles in tourism field?
Seychelles

Droits : info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
urn:doi:10.4000/etudescaribeennes.5642
http://journals.openedition.org/etudescaribeennes/5642