Éditeur(s) : HAL CCSD IOP Publishing
Résumé : Tropical forests of the Guiana Shield are the most affected by gold-mining in South America,experiencing an exponential increase in deforestation since the early 2000’s.Using yearly deforestation data encompassing Guyana, Suriname, French Guiana and theBrazilian State of Amapá, we demonstrated a strong relationship between deforestation due togold-mining and gold-prices at the regional scale. In order to assess additional drivers ofdeforestation due to gold-mining, we focused on the national scale and highlighted theheterogeneity of the response to gold-prices under different political contexts. Deforestation dueto gold-mining over the Guiana Shield occurs mainly in Guyana and Suriname. On the contrary,past and current repressive policies in Amapá and French Guiana likely contribute to thedecorrelation of deforestation and gold prices. In this work, wefinally present a case studyfocusing on French Guiana and Suriname, two neighbouring countries with very different levelsof law enforcement against illegal gold-mining. We developed a modelling framework to estimatepotential deforestation leakages from French Guiana to Suriname in the border areas. Based onour assumptions, we estimated a decrease in deforestation due to gold-mining of approx. 4 300hectares in French Guiana and an increase of approx. 12 100 hectares in Suriname in response tothe active military repression of illegal gold-mining launched in French Guiana.Gold-mining in the Guiana Shield provides challenging questions regarding REDDþimplementation. These questions are discussed at the end of this study and are important topolicy makers who need to provide sustainable alternative employment to local populations inorder to ensure the effectiveness of environmental policies.
ISSN: 1748-9326

hal-01512075
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01512075
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01512075/document
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01512075/file/document%20%2828%29_%7B81107B08-30D1-44D2-877D-32F6DFAEF28A%7D.pdf
DOI : 10.1088/1748-9326/aa6082

Éditeur(s) : HAL CCSD Landes Bioscience
Résumé : International audience
In 2008 we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, research on this topic has continued to accelerate, and many new scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Accordingly, it is important to update these guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Various reviews have described the range of assays that have been used for this purpose. Nevertheless, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to measure autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. A key point that needs to be emphasized is that there is a difference between measurements that monitor the numbers or volume of autophagic elements (e.g., autophagosomes or autolysosomes) at any stage of the autophagic process vs. those that measure flux through the autophagy pathway (i.e., the complete process); thus, a block in macroautophagy that results in autophagosome accumulation needs to be differentiated from stimuli that result in increased autophagic activity, defined as increased autophagy induction coupled with increased delivery to, and degradation within, lysosomes (in most higher eukaryotes and some protists such as Dictyostelium) or the vacuole (in plants and fungi). In other words, it is especially important that investigators new to the field understand that the appearance of more autophagosomes does not necessarily equate with more autophagy. In fact, in many cases, autophagosomes accumulate because of a block in trafficking to lysosomes without a concomitant change in autophagosome biogenesis, whereas an increase in autolysosomes may reflect a reduction in degradative activity. Here, we present a set of guidelines for the selection and interpretation of methods for use by investigators who aim to examine macroautophagy and related processes, as well as for reviewers who need to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of papers that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a formulaic set of rules, because the appropriate assays depend in part on the question being asked and the system being used. In addition, we emphasize that no individual assay is guaranteed to be the most appropriate one in every situation, and we strongly recommend the use of multiple assays to monitor autophagy. In these guidelines, we consider these various methods of assessing autophagy and what information can, or cannot, be obtained from them. Finally, by discussing the merits and limits of particular autophagy assays, we hope to encourage technical innovation in the field.
Autophagy

hal-00735751
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00735751
PUBMED : 22966490

Éditeur(s) : HAL CCSD EDP Sciences
Résumé : No matter which production system is considered (5% milk farms, 95% meatfarms), the Salers breed of cattle carries a strong image. Our work aims at showing that the development of the main territory in which the breed is found may rely on specific and identified products afforded by the breed. Multidisciplinary research (animal science, economics, food quality) and different methods (surveys, follow-up, and experimentation) were implemented. The experiments focused on the control of various types of production (milk, carcasses) and on a detailed description of the products (meat, cheese), given the attributes and the special behaviour of the animals. A before-weaning feeding approach favouring milk and forage later proves more efficient for finishing the young Salers male (15 months). The meat from these young bulls is clear, classified as mid-range quality, and can be sold in supermarkets. Parallel observations were made on farms and specific protein markers of juiciness were identified. Milk from Salers cows differs from that of Holstein especially in the nature of the fatty acids. Calf suckling before milking reinforces the differences. Cheeses made with raw milk from the breed differ in their textures and flavours. The cow must however be milked with her calf and the level of labour required impedes economic valorisation of the breed. Consumer surveys have confirmed the strong image of the breed that has a good potential for commercial development. Willingness to pay for identified products, however, is stronger for cheese (up to 30%) than for meat (up to 10%). Recognized qualities of products identified as issued from Salers cattle and originality in production systems can bring significant gains to various local actors, which can be considered as territorial rents.
La race bovine Salers bénéficie d’une image forte et reconnue, indépendante du système de production, laitier pour 5 % des élevages, ou allaitant pour 95 %. Pour autant le développement du « berceau de la race » peut-il s’appuyer sur les combinaisons de productions spécifiques et identifiées qu’autorise cette race ? Des recherches multidisciplinaires (zootechnie, économie, qualité des aliments) et des méthodes d’investigation variées (enquêtes, suivis, expérimentation) ont été mises en œuvre pour répondre à cette question. Les expérimentations ont porté sur la maîtrise des itinéraires de production (lait, carcasses) et la connaissance fine des produits (fromages, viandes), compte tenu des aptitudes et du comportement de la race. Une conduite alimentaire privilégiant le lait et les fourrages avant sevrage est ainsi plus efficace pour la production d’un jeune bovin Salers (15 mois). La viande de ces taurillons est claire, classée en gamme intermédiaire, mais peut se valoriser en grande et moyenne distribution. Le lait des vaches Salers diffère de celui des vaches Holstein surtout par la nature de ses acides gras. La tétée d’amorçage du veau spécifique de la race et difficile à supprimer, renforce les différences de composition. Les fromages fabriqués avec ce lait traité à l’état cru diffèrent par leurs textures et arômes. Une filière laitière pérenne pourrait bien valoriser ces différences mais la pénibilité de la traite faite obligatoirement en présence du veau reste un obstacle. Des enquêtes auprès de consommateurs ont confirmé la forte image de la race vectrice de valorisation économique. Leur consentement à payer pour des produits identifiés est cependant plus fort pour le fromage (jusqu’à 30 %) que pour la viande (jusqu’à 10 %). Les qualités reconnues des produits identifiés comme issus de vaches Salers et l’originalité des systèmes de production peuvent apporter des plus-values significatives aux divers acteurs locaux, ce qui peut correspondre à une forme de rente territoriale.
ISSN: 1166-7699

hal-00992549
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00992549
DOI : 10.1684/agr.2014.0687
PRODINRA : 259206