Éditeur(s) : HAL CCSD BioMed Central
Résumé : International audience
BACKGROUND: In the context of recent guidelines on invasive candidiasis (IC), how French intensive care units (ICUs) are managing IC? METHODS: This is a prospective observational multicenter cohort study. During 1 year (2012-2013), 87 French ICUs enrolled consecutive patients with suspected or proven IC (SIC or PIC) and receiving systemic antifungal therapy (SAT). Data were collected up to 28 days after inclusion. RESULTS: We studied 835 patients, 291 with PIC and 544 with SIC. At SAT initiation, patients with SIC were significantly more severe (SAPS II 50.1 ± 18.7 vs. 46.2 ± 18.0). Severe sepsis or septic shock prompted to initiate empiric SAT in 70 % of SIC. Within 4 days in median, the initial SAT was modified in 49 % of patients with PIC vs. 33 % patients with SIC. Modifications were most often motivated by mycological results, and de-escalation was the most frequent change. Regarding compliance to IC management guidelines, echinocandin was used for 182 (62.5 %) patients with PIC, and 287 (52.7 %) of those with SIC; central venous catheter was removed in 87 (54.3 %) of patients with candidaemia, and 43 of the remaining patients received echinocandin; and de-escalation was undertaken after 5 days of SAT in 142 patients, after 10 days in 13 patients. As 20.6 % of SIC were secondarily documented, 403/835 (48 %) patients had finally a proven IC. Candida albicans was the main pathogen (65.3 %), then Candida glabrata (15.9 %). The 28-day mortality rates were 40.0 % in candidaemia, 25.4 % in cIAI, and 26.7 % in deep-seated candidiasis. In the overall population of patients with proven IC, four independent prognostic factors were identified: immunosuppression (Odds Ratio (OR) = 1.977: 1.03-3.794 95 % confidence interval (CI), p = 0.04), age (OR = 1.035; 1.017-1.053 95 % CI; p  extless 0.001), SAPS extgreater46 on ICU admission (OR = 2.894; 1.81-4.626 95 % CI; p  extless 0.001), and surgery just before or during ICU stay (OR = 0.473; 0.29-0.77 95 % CI; p  extless 0.001). CONCLUSION: When SAT is initiated in French ICUs, the IC is ultimately proven for 48 % of patients. Empiric SAT is initiated in severely ill ICU patients. The initial SAT is often adapted, with de-escalation to fluconazole when possible. Mortality rate remains high
ISSN: 2110-5820

hal-01259216
https://hal-univ-rennes1.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01259216
DOI : 10.1186/s13613-015-0103-7
PUBMED : 26743881

Éditeur(s) : HAL CCSD Elsevier Masson
Résumé : National audience
Introduction Les péritonites secondaires à levures représentent une part importante des candidoses profondes et de leur traitement. Peu d’outils sont disponibles afin de prédire au mieux les patients susceptible d’avoir une culture du liquide péritonéal positive. L’étude AMARCAND II (10/202–09/2013) a analysé les patients de réanimation recevant un traitement antifongique pour un candidose invasive prouvée ou suspectée. L’analyse des patients ayant un traitement probabiliste pour péritonite à levure suspectée est présentée ici. Patients et méthodes Cent soixante-douze patients parmi les 835 inclus ont été analysés. Les patients ayant une documentation mycologique (groupe D) ont été comparés à ceux ayant une culture à levure négative (groupe ND). La performance du Candida score [1] et du Peritonitis score [2] ont été évalués dans cette population de candidose profonde suspectée. Résultats Parmi les 172 patients, 51 ont eu une péritonite documentée à levure et 121 un culture à levure négative. Les caractéristiques des groupes sont présentées dans le Tableau 1. L’AUC du Peritonitis score était de 0,63 [0,54–0,72] contre 0,40 [0,31–0,49] pour le Candida score, p = 0,005. Pour un Peritonitis score ≥ 3, la sensibilité était de 39,2 %, la spécificité de 81,8 %, la VPP de 47,6 % et la VPN de 76,2 %. Le Candida score ne permettait pas de classer les patients atteints de péritonite à levure. Discussion Peu d’éléments permettent de différencier les patients qui vont avoir une infection documentée des autres. La localisation sus-mésocolique de l’infection et l’antibiothérapie de plus de 48 heures sont les éléments les plus fiables retrouvés. Le Peritonitis score reste intéressant dans ce contexte mais le Candida score n’a aucune utilité
ISSN: 2352-5800

hal-01244999
https://hal-univ-rennes1.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01244999
DOI : 10.1016/j.anrea.2015.07.329

Éditeur(s) : HAL CCSD American Society for Microbiology
Résumé : International audience
Molecular diagnosis of congenital toxoplasmosis or disseminated toxoplasmosis is based mainly on PCR. The repeated DNA element rep529 has become the main DNA target used in most PCR methods, whether laboratory developed or commercial. In this multicenter study, we evaluated the Toxoplasma ELITe MGB (Elitech) commercial kit by comparison with three reference quantitative PCR assays (RAs) used routinely in three proficient laboratories of the French National Reference Center for Toxoplasmosis network, using Toxoplasma calibrated suspensions diluted to obtain a range of concentrations from 0.1 to 10,000 parasites/ml. These suspensions were extracted with either the DNA extraction kit (EXTRAblood; Elitech) recommended by the manufacturer or the QIAamp DNA minikit (Qiagen). The Toxoplasma ELITe MGB assay was also evaluated on a panel of 128 clinical samples, including 56 amniotic fluid samples, 55 placenta samples, and various other samples, of which 95 originated from patients with proven toxoplasmosis. The ELITe MGB assay amplified low-concentration replicates (<10 parasites/ml) of calibrated suspensions less frequently than the RAs of 2/3 laboratories. Additionally, the combination of EXTRAblood and Toxoplasma ELITe MGB yielded poorer sensitivity than the combination of QIAamp DNA minikit and ELITe MGB for low parasite concentrations (P < 0.001 for 1 parasite/ml). On clinical samples, the sensitivity and the specificity of the commercial assay were 89% and 100%, respectively. The sensitivity ranged from 79% (placenta samples) to 100% (amniotic fluid samples). Overall, this study shows that the Toxoplasma ELITe MGB assay is suitable for the diagnosis of toxoplasmosis from non-cell-rich or non-hemoglobin-rich samples and that the EXTRAblood kit is not optimal.
ISSN: 0095-1137

hal-01526432
https://hal-univ-rennes1.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01526432
https://hal-univ-rennes1.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01526432/document
https://hal-univ-rennes1.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01526432/file/Evaluation%20of%20the%20Toxoplasma.pdf
DOI : 10.1128/JCM.02379-16

Éditeur(s) : HAL CCSD
18th European Congress of Clinical Microbiology an Infectious Diseases (ECCMID)
Barcelone, Spain

hal-00676899
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00676899