Éditeur(s) : Université des Antilles et de la Guyane. Faculté des lettres et sciences humaine Association Ouacabou Conseil général de la Martinique Musée Départemental d'Archéologie Précolombienne et de la Préhistoire
Extrait de : 24e congrès international de l'Association internationale d'archéologie de la Caraïbe, du 24 au 29 juillet 2011. Université des Antilles et de la Guyane"
Description : Cette communication nous présente une étude sur la plantation de Betty's Hope à Antigua. Betty's Hope est une ancienne propriété sucrière qui a fonctionné entre 1651 et 1944. Quel impact environnemental provoque la culture du sucre à Antigua ? Comment fonctionnait cette plantation sucrière (hommes, matériels, machines)?
Siècle(s) traité(s) : 20
Droits : CC-BY-NC-ND - Attribution - Pas d'utilisation commerciale - Pas de modification
Permalien : http://www.manioc.org/fichiers/V12090
V12090

Éditeur(s) : Printed at the Shakespeare Press, by W. Nicol, for John Major Printed at the Shakespeare Press, by W. Nicol, for John Major ( London (Fleet St.) )
Résumé : (Citation/Reference) Lovett, R.W. Robinson Crusoe,
(Citation/Reference) NUC pre-1956
(Citation/Reference) Osborne Coll.,
(Statement of Responsibility) with introductory verses by Bernard Barton ; and illustrated with numerous engravings from drawings by George Cruikshank expressly designed for this edition.
"The text ... is restored in this edition by a careful collation with the early copies of both parts of the work." -- Pref. signed J.M. [i.e. John Major]
Caption title, v. 2: Farther adventures of Robinson Crusoe.
Frontispiece engraved by Augs. Fox (v.1) and W. Raddon (v.2); other engravers include Gorway, J. Jackson, Slader, and Thos. Williams.
Part I and II of Robinson Crusoe. Part II originally published under the title: Farther adventures of Robinson Crusoe.
England -- London

Droits : This item is presumed to be in the public domain. The University of Florida George A. Smathers Libraries respect the intellectual property rights of others and do not claim any copyright interest in this item. Users of this work have responsibility for determining copyright status prior to reusing, publishing or reproducing this item for purposes other than what is allowed by fair use or other copyright exemptions. Any reuse of this item in excess of fair use or other copyright exemptions may require permission of the copyright holder. The Smathers Libraries would like to learn more about this item and invite individuals or organizations to contact The Department of Special and Area Studies Collections (special@uflib.ufl.edu) with any additional information they can provide.
001801246
29632426
AJM5007

Éditeur(s) : Printed at the Shakespeare Press, by W. Nicol, for John Major Printed at the Shakespeare Press, by W. Nicol, for John Major ( London (Fleet St.) )
Résumé : (Citation/Reference) Lovett, R.W. Robinson Crusoe,
(Citation/Reference) NUC pre-1956
(Citation/Reference) Osborne Coll.,
(Statement of Responsibility) with introductory verses by Bernard Barton ; and illustrated with numerous engravings from drawings by George Cruikshank expressly designed for this edition.
"The text ... is restored in this edition by a careful collation with the early copies of both parts of the work." -- Pref. signed J.M. [i.e. John Major]
Caption title, v. 2: Farther adventures of Robinson Crusoe.
Frontispiece engraved by Augs. Fox (v.1) and W. Raddon (v.2); other engravers include Gorway, J. Jackson, Slader, and Thos. Williams.
Part I and II of Robinson Crusoe. Part II originally published under the title: Farther adventures of Robinson Crusoe.
England -- London

Droits : This item is presumed to be in the public domain. The University of Florida George A. Smathers Libraries respect the intellectual property rights of others and do not claim any copyright interest in this item. Users of this work have responsibility for determining copyright status prior to reusing, publishing or reproducing this item for purposes other than what is allowed by fair use or other copyright exemptions. Any reuse of this item in excess of fair use or other copyright exemptions may require permission of the copyright holder. The Smathers Libraries would like to learn more about this item and invite individuals or organizations to contact The Department of Special and Area Studies Collections (special@uflib.ufl.edu) with any additional information they can provide.
001801246
29632426
AJM5007

Éditeur(s) : HAL CCSD Landes Bioscience
Résumé : International audience
In 2008 we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, research on this topic has continued to accelerate, and many new scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Accordingly, it is important to update these guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Various reviews have described the range of assays that have been used for this purpose. Nevertheless, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to measure autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. A key point that needs to be emphasized is that there is a difference between measurements that monitor the numbers or volume of autophagic elements (e.g., autophagosomes or autolysosomes) at any stage of the autophagic process vs. those that measure flux through the autophagy pathway (i.e., the complete process); thus, a block in macroautophagy that results in autophagosome accumulation needs to be differentiated from stimuli that result in increased autophagic activity, defined as increased autophagy induction coupled with increased delivery to, and degradation within, lysosomes (in most higher eukaryotes and some protists such as Dictyostelium) or the vacuole (in plants and fungi). In other words, it is especially important that investigators new to the field understand that the appearance of more autophagosomes does not necessarily equate with more autophagy. In fact, in many cases, autophagosomes accumulate because of a block in trafficking to lysosomes without a concomitant change in autophagosome biogenesis, whereas an increase in autolysosomes may reflect a reduction in degradative activity. Here, we present a set of guidelines for the selection and interpretation of methods for use by investigators who aim to examine macroautophagy and related processes, as well as for reviewers who need to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of papers that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a formulaic set of rules, because the appropriate assays depend in part on the question being asked and the system being used. In addition, we emphasize that no individual assay is guaranteed to be the most appropriate one in every situation, and we strongly recommend the use of multiple assays to monitor autophagy. In these guidelines, we consider these various methods of assessing autophagy and what information can, or cannot, be obtained from them. Finally, by discussing the merits and limits of particular autophagy assays, we hope to encourage technical innovation in the field.
Autophagy

hal-00735751
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00735751
PUBMED : 22966490