Éditeur(s) : HAL CCSD ACSM
Résumé : International audience
PURPOSE AND METHODS: This study was designed to determine whether the physiological responses elicited during the run part of repeated bouts of cycle-run exercise are similar to those required during the run segment of a cycle-run succession. Thirteen male triathletes underwent four successive laboratory trials: 1) an incremental treadmill test, 2) an incremental cycle test, 3) 30 min of cycling followed by 20 min of running (C-R), and 4) five repeated bouts of 6 min of cycling and 4 min of running (X-CR). During the C-R and X-CR trials, venous blood samples were obtained to measure lactate, epinephrine and norepinephrine concentrations. During all trials, ventilatory data were collected every min using an automated breath-by-breath system. RESULTS: The results showed that 1) the cardiorespiratory responses observed during running were similar in the X-CR and C-R trials, 2) the lactate concentration was similar in both trials, 3) the epinephrine concentration was greater (277.9 +/- 11.9 vs 169.8 +/- 86.7 pg x mL(-1), P < 0.025) in X-CR than in C-R, and 4) the norepinephrine concentration was similar in both trials, except at the first cycle-run succession (T1) of X-CR. CONCLUSION: We concluded that 1) multi-block training is a good method to stimulate the specific adaptations required for the cycle-run succession, and particularly for the cycle-run transition, and 2) multi-block training seems to induce a greater catecholaminergic response, which may be due to a combination of an inherent effect of this type of training and the triathletes' relative lack of experience with it. In any case, the efficacy of the multi-block model needs to be more thoroughly evaluated over the course of a longer-term training program.
Medicine & Science in Sports & exercise

hal-00720475
https://hal.univ-antilles.fr/hal-00720475
https://hal.univ-antilles.fr/hal-00720475/document
https://hal.univ-antilles.fr/hal-00720475/file/Article_2_.pdf

Éditeur(s) : HAL CCSD Elsevier Masson
Résumé : International audience
Objectifs. - Évaluer les effets du triathlon classique (1,5 km natation, 40 km cyclisme, 10 km course à pied) sur la capacité de diffusion pulmonaire (DLCO) 24 heures après la compétition. Méthodes et résultats. - Dix triathlètes masculins (21,5 ± 2,8 ans) ont effectué une spirométrie et une mesure de la capacité de diffusion pulmonaire avant la compétition (pré-T) et 24 heures après l'épreuve (post-T). Les résultats montrent une diminution significative du volume expiratoire maximal en 1 s (5,17 ± 0,4 L.s-1 contre 4,09 ± 0,6 L.s-1) et du débit expiratoire maximal 25-75 % de la capacité vitale (6,98 ± 0,2 L.s-1 contre 4,90 ± 0,2 L.s-1). En revanche, les résultats ne montrent pas de différence significative entre les DLCO pré-T et post-T (38,1 ± 3,3 mL.min-1.mmHg-1 contre 37,1 ± 3,7 mL.min-1.mmHg-1) ni les ratios DLCO/VA (5,59 ± 0,5 mL.min-1.mmHg-1.A-1 contre 5,55 ± 0,7 ml.min-1.mmHg-1.A-1). Conclusion. - La DLCO est normale chez les triathlètes 24 heures après une compétition classique. Ceci peut traduire l'absence de lésions alvéolocapillaires pendant le triathlon. La baisse de la DLCO rapportée deux heures après un exercice dans la littérature peut s'expliquer par la baisse du volume sanguin pulmonaire qui apparaît comme un phénomène transitoire. Cependant, la baisse des débits pulmonaires observée 24 heures après le triathlon suggère la persistance chez les triathlètes d'un syndrome obstructif bronchique.
ISSN: 0765-1597

hal-00720522
https://hal.univ-antilles.fr/hal-00720522
https://hal.univ-antilles.fr/hal-00720522/document
https://hal.univ-antilles.fr/hal-00720522/file/Article_3_.pdf

Éditeur(s) : HAL CCSD Thieme Publishing
Résumé : International audience
To determine the effect of triathlete performance level on the cardiorespiratory responses elicited by the cycle-run succession, eight regionally and nationally-ranked (Competitive) and five internationally-ranked (Elite) male triathletes underwent four successive laboratory trials: 1) an incremental treadmill test, 2) an incremental cycle test, 3) 30 min of cycling followed by 20 min of running (C-R), and 4) a 20-min control run (R) at the same speed as the run in C-R. Before and 10 min after the third and fourth trials the triathletes underwent lung function testing: spirometry and diffusing capacity testing for carbon monoxide (DL(CO)). During the C-R trial blood samples were drawn to measure venous lactate concentration. During all trials ventilatory data were collected every minute using an automated breath-by-breath system. The results showed that 1) the oxygen uptake (VO2) of post-cycling running versus running alone was similar for both groups; 2) the ventilatory responses (VE, VE/VO2, VE/VC02 and f) of C-R running versus R were significantly higher (P < 0.005) for the Competitive group; and 3) a significant decrease (P< 0.05) in DL(CO) was also noted after the C-R trial in the Competitive group but not in the Elite group. We concluded that 1) the ventilatory responses during a run subsequent to cycling may be related to the triathlete performance level, and 2) the C-R trial induced specific alterations in pulmonary function that may be associated with respiratory muscle alteration and exercise-induced hypoxemia in the Competitive triathletes.
ISSN: 0172-4622

hal-00720719
https://hal.univ-antilles.fr/hal-00720719