Éditeur(s) : HAL CCSD Springer Verlag
Résumé : International audience
Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) is a major diagnostic tool in lung diseases, including viral respiratory infections. We aimed to better define the situations where viral tests should be performed on BAL fluid (BALF). We retrospectively studied all cases where viral tests [immunofluorescence, immunocytochemistry, viral culture, and/or polymerase chain reaction (PCR)] were performed on BALF during a period of 1 year (2008) in our institution. We compared the characteristics of patients with virus-positive versus virus-negative BALF. Of the 636 BALF samples sent to the microbiology laboratory, 232 underwent viral tests. Of these, 70 (30 %) were positive and identified 85 viruses: herpes simplex virus (HSV)-1 (n = 27), cytomegalovirus (CMV, n = 23), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV, n = 18), human herpesvirus (HHV)-6 (n = 12), respiratory syncytial virus (RSV, n = 3), rhinovirus (n = 1), and adenovirus (n = 1). The variables associated with positive viral tests on univariate analysis were immunosuppression [human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), corticosteroids >10 mg/day for ≥3 weeks, or other immunosuppressive therapy], ground-glass attenuations on computed tomography (CT) scanning, late-onset ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), and durations of (i) hospital stay, (ii) intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and (iii) mechanical ventilation before BAL (p < 0.01 for each comparison). On multivariate analysis, only immunosuppression [odds ratio (OR) 6.4, 95 % confidence interval (CI) [2.8-14.3], p < 0.0001] and ground-glass attenuations (OR 3.7, 95 % CI [1.8-7.7], p = 0.0004) remained associated with virus-positive BAL. None of the viral tests performed on BALF for the initial assessment of diffuse infiltrative lung disease (n = 15) was positive. PCR improved the diagnostic yield of viral tests on BALF by 50 %. Testing for viruses on BALF should be mostly restricted to immunocompromised patients with acute respiratory diseases and/or patients with unexplained ground-glass attenuations on CT scanning.
ISSN: 0934-9723

hal-00873158
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00873158
DOI : 10.1007/s10096-012-1791-7
PUBMED : 23238685

Éditeur(s) : HAL CCSD American Physiological Society
Résumé : International audience
Interleukin (IL)-33 is crucially involved in liver pathology and drives hepatoprotective functions. However, the regulation of IL-33 by cytokines of the IL-6 family, including oncostatin M (OSM) and IL-6, is not well studied. The aim of the present study was to determine whether OSM mediates regulation of IL-33 expression in liver cells. Intramuscular administration in mice of an adenovirus encoding OSM (AdOSM) leads to increase in expression of OSM in muscles, liver, and serum of AdOSM-infected mice compared with control mice. The increase of circulating OSM markedly regulated mRNA of genes associated with blood vessel biology, chemotaxis, cellular death, induction of cell adhesion molecules, and the alarmin cytokine IL-33 in liver. Steady-state IL-33 mRNA was upregulated by OSM at an early phase (8 h) following AdOSM infection. At the protein level, the expression of IL-33 was significantly induced in liver endothelial cells [liver sinusoidal endothelial cells (LSEC) and vascular endothelial cells] with a peak at 8 days post-AdOSM infection in mice. In addition, we found OSM-stimulated human microvascular endothelial HMEC-1 cells and human LSEC/TRP3 cells showed a significant increase in expression of IL-33 mRNA in a dose-dependent manner in cell culture. The OSM-mediated overexpression of IL-33 was associated with the activation/enrichment of CD4(+)ST2(+) cells in liver of AdOSM-infected mice compared with adenovirus encoding green fluorescent protein-treated control mice. In summary, these data suggest that the cytokine OSM regulates the IL-33 expression in liver endothelial cells in vivo and in HMEC-1/TRP3 cells in vitro and may specifically expand the target CD4(+)ST2(+) cells in liver
ISSN: 0193-1857

hal-01220632
https://hal-univ-rennes1.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01220632
DOI : 10.1152/ajpgi.00398.2014
PUBMED : 26251474

Éditeur(s) : HAL CCSD Elsevier Masson
Résumé : International audience
The Société de pneumologie de langue française defines acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AE COPD) as an increase in daily respiratory symptoms, basically duration ≥ 48h or need for treatment adjustment. Etiology of EA COPD are mainly infectious, viral (rhinovirus, influenzae or parainfluenzae virus, coronavirus, adenovirus and respiratory syncytial virus) or bacterial (Haemophilus influenzae, Streptococcus pneumoniae, or Moraxella catarrhalis). Pollutant exposure can also lead to AE COPD, such as NO2, SO2, ozone or particulates (PM10 and PM2.5). In 30% the etiology remains unknown. Differential diagnoses of AE COPD include infectious pneumonia, pneumothorax, acute heart failure and pulmonary embolism. Presences of signs of severity impose hospitalization: signs of respiratory distress, shock, acute confusion but also fragile patients, insufficient home support or absence of response to initial treatment. AE COPD treatments consist on increase in bronchodilators, chest physiotherapy, and antibiotics if sputum is frankly purulent. Systemic corticosteroids should not be systematic.Recommended dose is 0.5 mg/kg on short course (7 days). During hospitalization, oxygen supplementation and thromboprophylaxis could be prescribed. The main interest in noninvasive ventilation is persistent hypercapnia despite optimal medical management. During ambulatory management or hospitalization, clinical assessment at 48-72h is mandatory. L’exacerbation aiguë de bronchopneumopathie chronique obstructive (EA BPCO) représente un événement important dans l’histoire naturelle de la BPCO, notamment en cas d’hospitalisation. Les EA BPCO interviennent dans la gravité et l’évolution de la BPCO ; et leur prévention est un des objectifs principal des traitements de fond.
La Société de pneumologie de langue française définie l’exacerbation aiguë de bronchopneumopathie chronique obstructive (EA BPCO) comme une majoration des symptômes respiratoires au-delà des variations quotidiennes, en pratique, d’une durée ≥ 48h ou justifiant une modification thérapeutique. L’étiologie de ces EA BPCO est principalement infectieuse, virale (rhinovirus, virus influenzae et parainfluenzae, coronavirus, adénovirus et virus respiratoire syncytial) ou bactérienne (principalement Haemophilus influenzae, Streptococcus pneumoniae et Moraxella catarrhalis). Elles peuvent également résulter de l’exposition à certains polluants comme le NO2, le SO2, l’ozone et la pollution particulaire (PM10 et PM2,5). L’étiologie reste indéterminée dans près de 30 % des cas. Les diagnostics différentiels des EA BPCO incluent les pneumopathies infectieuses, les pneumothorax, les poussées d’insuffisance cardiaque et les embolies pulmonaires. La présence de signes de gravité conditionnent l’hospitalisation : signes d’insuffisance respiratoire aiguë, de choc ou de défaillance neurologique, mais aussi en cas de patient fragile, d’absence de soutien familial à domicile ou d’absence de réponse au traitement initial. Le traitement d’une EA BPCO consiste en une majoration des bronchodilatateurs, une kinésithérapie respiratoire, une antibiothérapie en cas d’expectoration franchement purulente.La prescription de corticoïdes systémiques ne doit pas être systématique. La dose recommandée est de 0,5 mg/kg sur une courte période (7 jours). Lors d’une hospitalisation, une oxygénothérapie et une thromboprophylaxie peuvent être prescrite. La ventilation noninvasiveest principalement indiquée en cas de persistance d’une hypercapnie malgré un traitement médical optimal. Que le patient soit pris en charge en ambulatoire ou en hospitalisation, une réévaluation clinique à 48-72h est indispensable.
ISSN: 0755-4982

hal-01117949
https://hal-univ-rennes1.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01117949
https://hal-univ-rennes1.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01117949/document
https://hal-univ-rennes1.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01117949/file/Prise%20en%20charge%20des%20exacerbations_accepted.pdf
DOI : 10.1016/j.jeurea.2015.02.002