Éditeur(s) : Wiley-blackwell
Résumé : Aim The aims of this study were: (1) to identify global communities of tuna and billfish species through quantitative statistical analyses of global fisheries data; (2) to describe the spatial distribution, main environmental drivers and species composition of each community detected; and (3) to determine whether the spatial distribution of each community could be linked to the environmental conditions that affect lower trophic levels by comparing the partitions identified in this study with Longhursts biogeochemical provinces. Location The global ocean from 60 degrees S to 65 degrees N. Methods We implemented a new numerical procedure based on a hierarchical clustering method and a nonparametric probabilistic test to divide the oceanic biosphere into biomes and ecoregions. This procedure was applied to a database that comprised standardized data on commercial longline catches for 15 different species of tuna and billfish over a period of more than 50 years (i.e. 1953-2007). For each ecoregion identified (i.e. characteristic tuna and billfish community), we analysed the relationships between species composition and environmental factors. Finally, we compared the biogeochemical provinces of Longhurst with the ecoregions that we identified. Results Tuna and billfish species form nine well-defined communities across the global ocean. Each community occurs in regions with specific environmental conditions and shows a distinctive species composition. High similarity (68.8% homogeneity) between the spatial distribution of the communities of tuna and billfish and the biogeochemical provinces suggests a strong relationship between these species and the physical and chemical characteristics of the global ocean. Main conclusions Despite their high tolerance for a wide range of environmental conditions, these highly migratory species are partitioned into clear geographical communities in the ocean at a global scale. The similarity between biogeochemical and biotic divisions in the ocean suggests that the global ocean is a mosaic of large biogeographical ecosystems, each characterized by specific environmental conditions that have a strong effect on the composition of the trophic web.
Journal Of Biogeography (0305-0270) (Wiley-blackwell), 2012-01 , Vol. 39 , N. 1 , P. 114-129

Droits : 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
http://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00060/17141/14716.pdf
DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2699.2011.02582.x
http://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00060/17141/

Éditeur(s) : CNRS Programme Environnement : Colloque Recherche et Environnement Strasbourg, 24-25 Septembre 1990
Résumé : As the third millennium draws near, industrial societies are becoming aware of the limits of what they can do to constrain the biosphere, ending up where "primitive" societies left off. If the perverse effects of a century of technical revolution and economic expansion are above all perceptible in the area of multiple contaminations that put in danger the well-being of people, environments and in a general way the biosphere's functioning, they also concern the standardisation of products and landscapes and overinvestment in the means of exploiting resources (inputs increasing more rapidly than outputs, when they are not bringing about their decrease). The search for solutions to the growing imbalance of the relationships Man – Nature – Resources cannot reside in a partial approach or a technical resolution of the problems posed by using renewable resources.
(OCR non controlé) A l'approche du troisième millénaire, les sociétés industrielles prennent la mesure des limites de leurs possibilités de contraindre la biosphère, aboutissant là d'où partaient les sociétés "primitives". Si les effets pervers d'un siècle de révolution technique et d'expansion économique sont surtout perceptibles dans le domaine des pollutions multiples qui mettent en péril le bien-être des personnes, les milieux et d'une manière générale le fonctionnement de la biosphère, ils concernent également l'uniformisation des produits et des paysages et le surinvestissement dans les moyens d'exploitation des ressources (les intrants croissant plus vite que les rendements, quand ils n'entraînent pas leur baisse). La recherche de solutions au déséquilibre croissant des relations Hommes - Nature - Ressources ne peut résider dans une approche partielle ou une résolution technique des problèmes posés par l'utilisation des ressources renouvelables.

Droits : info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/1990/acte-2416.pdf
http://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00000/2416/

Éditeur(s) : Elsevier
Résumé : Evidence has accumulated that climate variability influences the state and functioning of marine ecosystems. At the same time increasing pressure from exploitation and other human activities has been shown to impact exploited and non-exploited species and potentially modify ecosystem structure. There has been a tendency among marine scientists to pose the question as a dichotomy, i.e., whether (1) "natural" climate variability or (2) fishery exploitation bears the primary responsibility for population declines in fish populations and the associated ecosystem changes. However, effects of both climate and exploitation are probably substantially involved in most cases. More importantly, climate and exploitation interact in their effects, such that climate may cause failure in a fishery management scheme but that fishery exploitation may also disrupt the ability of a resource population to withstand, or adjust to, climate changes. Here, we review how exploitation, by altering the structure of populations and ecosystems, can modify their ability to respond to climate. The demographic effects of fishing (removal of large-old individuals) can have substantial consequences on the capacity of populations to buffer climate variability through various pathways (direct demographic effects, effects on migration, parental effects). In a similar way, selection of population sub-units within metapopulations may also lead to a reduction in the capacity of populations to withstand climate variability and change. At the ecosystem level, reduced complexity by elimination of species, such as might occur by fishing, may be destabilizing and could lead to reduced resilience to perturbations. Differential exploitation of marine resources could also promote increased turnover rates in marine ecosystems, which would exacerbate the effects of environmental changes. Overall (and despite the specificities of local situations) reduction in marine diversity at the individual, population and ecosystem levels will likely lead to a reduction in the resilience and an increase in the response of populations and ecosystems to future climate variability and change. Future management schemes will have to consider the structure and functioning of populations and ecosystems in a wider sense in order to maximise the ability of marine fauna to adapt to future climates. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Journal of Marine Systems (0924-7963) (Elsevier), 2010-02 , Vol. 79 , N. 3-4 , P. 403-417

Droits : 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
http://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/2010/publication-7384.pdf
DOI:10.1016/j.jmarsys.2008.12.018
http://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00000/7384/