Éditeur(s) : HAL CCSD Springer Verlag
Résumé : International audience
The purpose of this investigation was to characterize the management and prognosis of severe Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-negative patients. An observational cohort study of HIV-negative adults with PJP documented by bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) through Gomori-Grocott staining or immunofluorescence, admitted to one intensive care unit (ICU) for acute respiratory failure, was undertaken. From 1990 to 2010, 70 patients (24 females, 46 males) were included, with a mean age of 58.6 ± 18.3 years. The mean Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS)-II was 36.9 ± 20.4. Underlying conditions included hematologic malignancies (n = 21), vasculitis (n = 13), and solid tumors (n = 13). Most patients were receiving systemic corticosteroids (n = 63) and cytotoxic drugs (n = 51). Not a single patient received trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole as PJP prophylaxis. Endotracheal intubation (ETI) was required in 42 patients (60.0 %), including 38 with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). In-ICU mortality was 52.9 % overall, reaching 80.9 % and 86.8 %, respectively, for patients who required ETI and for patients with ARDS. In the univariate analysis, in-ICU mortality was associated with SAPS-II (p = 0.0131), ARDS (p < 0.0001), shock (p < 0.0001), and herpes simplex virus (HSV) or cytomegalovirus (CMV) on BAL (p = 0.0031). In the multivariate analysis, only ARDS was associated with in-ICU mortality (odds ratio [OR] 23.4 [4.5-121.9], p < 0.0001). PJP in non-HIV patients remains a serious disease with high in-hospital mortality. Pulmonary co-infection with HSV or CMV may contribute to fatal outcome.
ISSN: 0934-9723

inserm-00872789
http://www.hal.inserm.fr/inserm-00872789
DOI : 10.1007/s10096-012-1730-7
PUBMED : 22930407

Éditeur(s) : HAL CCSD Elsevier
Résumé : International audience
Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is the primary cause of nosocomial diarrhoea in industrialised countries, usually occurring as a complication of antibiotic therapy in elderly patients. Landmark events contributed to boosting interest in CDI over the last 10 years, including the emergence of unusually severe and recurrent CDI due to the NAP1/BI/027 strain, as well as reports suggesting that CDI is also significantly encountered in patients previously considered at no risk, such as community-acquired CDI in patients with no recent antibiotic use, or CDI during pregnancy. Despite this growing interest from the medical community, we do not know the real dimensions of the disease for the following reasons: (i) despite comprehensive guidelines published in Europe and in the USA, most laboratories still use diagnostic tests with suboptimal sensitivity as a 'rule-out' test, hence a significant proportion of CDIs remain undiagnosed; (ii) use of PCR as a stand-alone test by others will probably overestimate the real incidence of CDI and jeopardise any comparison between institutions with different diagnostic procedures; and (iii) transversal studies, with optimum design and diagnostic tests, are rapidly outdated due to the dramatic changes in CDI epidemiology that may occur from one year to another. To get an accurate picture of the real dimensions of the CDI issue, we need more systematic use of an adequate and homogeneous diagnostic strategy in the field as well as the implementation of continuous monitoring of CDI incidence through surveillance programmes.
ISSN: 0924-8579

inserm-00863350
http://www.hal.inserm.fr/inserm-00863350
http://www.hal.inserm.fr/inserm-00863350/document
http://www.hal.inserm.fr/inserm-00863350/file/Clostridium_difficile_infections._Do_we_know_the_real_dimensionssur the_problem-accepted.pdf
DOI : 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2013.04.009

Éditeur(s) : HAL CCSD American Medical Association (AMA)
Résumé : International audience
IMPORTANCE Although frequently used in treating intensive care unit (ICU) patients with sepsis, empirical antifungal therapy, initiated for suspected fungal infection, has not been shown to improve outcome. OBJECTIVE To determine whether empirical micafungin reduces invasive fungal infection (IFI)-free survival at day 28. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Multicenter double-blind placebo-controlled study of 260 nonneutropenic, nontransplanted, critically ill patients with ICU-acquired sepsis, multiple Candida colonization, multiple organ failure, exposed to broad-spectrum antibacterial agents, and enrolled between July 2012 and February 2015 in 19 French ICUs. INTERVENTIONS Empirical treatment with micafungin (100mg, once daily, for 14 days) (n = 131) vs placebo (n = 129). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary end pointwas survival without proven IFI 28 days after randomization. Key secondary end points included new proven fungal infections, survival at day 28 and day 90, organ failure, serum (1-3)-beta-D-glucan level evolution, and incidence of ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia. RESULTS Among 260 patients (mean age 63 years; 91 [35%] women), 251 (128, micafungin group; 123, placebo group) were included in the modified intent-to-treat analysis. Median values were 8 for Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, 3 for number of Candida-colonized sites, and 99 pg/mL for level of (1-3)-beta-D-glucan. On day 28, there were 82 (68%) patients in the micafungin group vs 79 (60.2%) in the placebo group who were alive and IFI free (hazard ratio [HR], 1.35 [95% CI, 0.87-2.08]). Results were similar among patients with a (1-3)-beta-D-glucan level of greater than 80 pg/mL (n = 175; HR, 1.41 [95% CI, 0.85-2.33]). Day-28 IFI-free survival in patients with a high SOFA score (> 8) was not significantly different when compared between the micafungin vs placebo groups (HR, 1.69 [95% CI, 0.96-2.94]). Use of empirical micafungin decreased the rate of new invasive fungal infection in 4 of 128 patients (3%) in the micafungin group vs placebo (15/123 patients [12%]) (P =.008). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among nonneutropenic critically ill patients with ICU-acquired sepsis, Candida species colonization at multiple sites, and multiple organ failure, empirical treatment with micafungin, compared with placebo, did not increase fungal infection-free survival at day 28.
ISSN: 0098-7484

hal-01405822
https://hal-univ-rennes1.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01405822
DOI : 10.1001/jama.2016.14655
PUBMED : 27706483

Éditeur(s) : HAL CCSD BioMed Central
Résumé : International audience
BACKGROUND: In the context of recent guidelines on invasive candidiasis (IC), how French intensive care units (ICUs) are managing IC? METHODS: This is a prospective observational multicenter cohort study. During 1 year (2012-2013), 87 French ICUs enrolled consecutive patients with suspected or proven IC (SIC or PIC) and receiving systemic antifungal therapy (SAT). Data were collected up to 28 days after inclusion. RESULTS: We studied 835 patients, 291 with PIC and 544 with SIC. At SAT initiation, patients with SIC were significantly more severe (SAPS II 50.1 ± 18.7 vs. 46.2 ± 18.0). Severe sepsis or septic shock prompted to initiate empiric SAT in 70 % of SIC. Within 4 days in median, the initial SAT was modified in 49 % of patients with PIC vs. 33 % patients with SIC. Modifications were most often motivated by mycological results, and de-escalation was the most frequent change. Regarding compliance to IC management guidelines, echinocandin was used for 182 (62.5 %) patients with PIC, and 287 (52.7 %) of those with SIC; central venous catheter was removed in 87 (54.3 %) of patients with candidaemia, and 43 of the remaining patients received echinocandin; and de-escalation was undertaken after 5 days of SAT in 142 patients, after 10 days in 13 patients. As 20.6 % of SIC were secondarily documented, 403/835 (48 %) patients had finally a proven IC. Candida albicans was the main pathogen (65.3 %), then Candida glabrata (15.9 %). The 28-day mortality rates were 40.0 % in candidaemia, 25.4 % in cIAI, and 26.7 % in deep-seated candidiasis. In the overall population of patients with proven IC, four independent prognostic factors were identified: immunosuppression (Odds Ratio (OR) = 1.977: 1.03-3.794 95 % confidence interval (CI), p = 0.04), age (OR = 1.035; 1.017-1.053 95 % CI; p  extless 0.001), SAPS extgreater46 on ICU admission (OR = 2.894; 1.81-4.626 95 % CI; p  extless 0.001), and surgery just before or during ICU stay (OR = 0.473; 0.29-0.77 95 % CI; p  extless 0.001). CONCLUSION: When SAT is initiated in French ICUs, the IC is ultimately proven for 48 % of patients. Empiric SAT is initiated in severely ill ICU patients. The initial SAT is often adapted, with de-escalation to fluconazole when possible. Mortality rate remains high
ISSN: 2110-5820

hal-01259216
https://hal-univ-rennes1.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01259216
DOI : 10.1186/s13613-015-0103-7
PUBMED : 26743881

Éditeur(s) : HAL CCSD Elsevier Masson
Résumé : National audience
Introduction Les péritonites secondaires à levures représentent une part importante des candidoses profondes et de leur traitement. Peu d’outils sont disponibles afin de prédire au mieux les patients susceptible d’avoir une culture du liquide péritonéal positive. L’étude AMARCAND II (10/202–09/2013) a analysé les patients de réanimation recevant un traitement antifongique pour un candidose invasive prouvée ou suspectée. L’analyse des patients ayant un traitement probabiliste pour péritonite à levure suspectée est présentée ici. Patients et méthodes Cent soixante-douze patients parmi les 835 inclus ont été analysés. Les patients ayant une documentation mycologique (groupe D) ont été comparés à ceux ayant une culture à levure négative (groupe ND). La performance du Candida score [1] et du Peritonitis score [2] ont été évalués dans cette population de candidose profonde suspectée. Résultats Parmi les 172 patients, 51 ont eu une péritonite documentée à levure et 121 un culture à levure négative. Les caractéristiques des groupes sont présentées dans le Tableau 1. L’AUC du Peritonitis score était de 0,63 [0,54–0,72] contre 0,40 [0,31–0,49] pour le Candida score, p = 0,005. Pour un Peritonitis score ≥ 3, la sensibilité était de 39,2 %, la spécificité de 81,8 %, la VPP de 47,6 % et la VPN de 76,2 %. Le Candida score ne permettait pas de classer les patients atteints de péritonite à levure. Discussion Peu d’éléments permettent de différencier les patients qui vont avoir une infection documentée des autres. La localisation sus-mésocolique de l’infection et l’antibiothérapie de plus de 48 heures sont les éléments les plus fiables retrouvés. Le Peritonitis score reste intéressant dans ce contexte mais le Candida score n’a aucune utilité
ISSN: 2352-5800

hal-01244999
https://hal-univ-rennes1.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01244999
DOI : 10.1016/j.anrea.2015.07.329

Éditeur(s) : HAL CCSD Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins
Résumé : International audience
o abstract
ISSN: 0269-9370

hal-01560146
https://hal-univ-rennes1.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01560146
DOI : 10.1097/QAD.0000000000001474
PUBMED : 28492398