Éditeur(s) : HAL CCSD Elsevier Masson
Résumé : International audience
Objective. — The aim of this study was to validate the French translation of the category-rating-10 used for assessing perceived exertion (RPE) when monitoring training loads. Methods. — Fifty athletes from individual (Taekwondo) and team sports (soccer) volunteered. Two forward translations, a reconciled version, and then a back-translation were completed to validate the final French version. French Session-RPE, heart rate, and duration were recorded for 622 training sessions.Results. —The comparability of language and similarity of interpretability using a Likert scale were 2 and 1, respectively. A high Cronbach’s coefficient ( = 0.77) was found. The intraclass correlation coefficient of session-RPE was 0.77. High correlations were determined between the session-RPE and HR-based methods during training sessions. The effect size was 0.97.Conclusion. — When monitoring training load, the French version of category-rating-10 exhibits similar reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change as the English version.
Objectif. — L’objet de cette étude était de valider la traduction franc¸aise de l’échelle de la Note de Catégorie-10 utilisée dans l’évaluation de la perception de l’effort pour contrôler la charge d’entraînement.Méthode. —Cinquante athlètes de sport individuel (taekwondo) et d’équipe (football) ont volontairement participé à l’étude. Deux traductions en mode direct, une version réconciliée, puis une traduction indirecte ont été effectuées pour évaluer la version franc¸aise finale. Lafréquence cardiaque, la durée et la charge d’entraînement quantifiée par la version franc¸aise ont été enregistrées durant 622 séances d’entraînement.Résultats. — La comparaison et la similarité de l’interprétation en utilisant l’échelle de Likert étaient de 2 et 1, respectivement. Un coefficient élevé de -Cronbach a été calculé ( = 0,77). Le coefficient de corrélation intraclasse de la RPE-de-séance était de 0,77. Des corrélations élevées ont été observées entre la RPE-séance et les différentes méthodes de contrôle de la charge d’entraînement basées sur la FC (les méthodes de Banister et d’Edwards). L’effet de taille de l’échantillon était de 0,97.Conclusion. —Dans le cadre du contrôle de la charge d’entraînement, la version franc¸aise de l’échelle de la Note de Catégorie-10 présente une similarité de fiabilité, validé et sensibilité aux changements avec la version anglaise.
ISSN: 0765-1597

hal-01163458
https://hal.univ-antilles.fr/hal-01163458
DOI : 10.1016/j.scispo.2012.07.008

Éditeur(s) : HAL CCSD Landes Bioscience
Résumé : International audience
In 2008 we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, research on this topic has continued to accelerate, and many new scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Accordingly, it is important to update these guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Various reviews have described the range of assays that have been used for this purpose. Nevertheless, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to measure autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. A key point that needs to be emphasized is that there is a difference between measurements that monitor the numbers or volume of autophagic elements (e.g., autophagosomes or autolysosomes) at any stage of the autophagic process vs. those that measure flux through the autophagy pathway (i.e., the complete process); thus, a block in macroautophagy that results in autophagosome accumulation needs to be differentiated from stimuli that result in increased autophagic activity, defined as increased autophagy induction coupled with increased delivery to, and degradation within, lysosomes (in most higher eukaryotes and some protists such as Dictyostelium) or the vacuole (in plants and fungi). In other words, it is especially important that investigators new to the field understand that the appearance of more autophagosomes does not necessarily equate with more autophagy. In fact, in many cases, autophagosomes accumulate because of a block in trafficking to lysosomes without a concomitant change in autophagosome biogenesis, whereas an increase in autolysosomes may reflect a reduction in degradative activity. Here, we present a set of guidelines for the selection and interpretation of methods for use by investigators who aim to examine macroautophagy and related processes, as well as for reviewers who need to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of papers that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a formulaic set of rules, because the appropriate assays depend in part on the question being asked and the system being used. In addition, we emphasize that no individual assay is guaranteed to be the most appropriate one in every situation, and we strongly recommend the use of multiple assays to monitor autophagy. In these guidelines, we consider these various methods of assessing autophagy and what information can, or cannot, be obtained from them. Finally, by discussing the merits and limits of particular autophagy assays, we hope to encourage technical innovation in the field.
Autophagy

hal-00735751
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00735751
PUBMED : 22966490