Éditeur(s) : HAL CCSD
Résumé : International audience
Objective Oxidative stress, excess production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and intense colonization of the respiratory tract by microorganisms are described in CF patients, leading to an influx in macrophages. This results in activation of NADPH oxidase that yields ROS, initiating the oxidative burst responsible for pathogen destruction. We showed that phagocytosis was altered in CF macrophages, yet oxidative status in this cell was not defined. The objective of this study is to draw a link between oxidative stress and plasma membrane integrity in CF macrophages, since lipid peroxidation is known to alter cell membrane. Methods Peripheral blood monocytes-derived macrophages were obtained from CF patients and healthy subjects. Plasma membrane fluidity was assessed with di4-ANEPPDHQ and oxidative status was measured with ROS indicating probes. Results In CF macrophages, membrane fluidity was increased whereas lipid peroxidation was diminished. Surprisingly, general oxidative status remained similar to the one observed in non-CF macrophages. Also, CF macrophages did not abolish chemically induced-oxidative stress. In non-CF macrophages, treatment with cholesterol slightly increased membrane fluidity whereas LPS treatment had no effect. Conclusion CF macrophages displayed an increased membrane fluidity associated with a decreased lipid peroxidation. This raises the hypothesis that membrane alteration in CF macrophages may be due to other mechanism than oxidative stress. Nevertheless, since the killing capacity of CF macrophage is defective, a deregulation of O•−2 production is very likely, suggesting alteration of NADPH oxidase or mitochondrial dysfunction
the 38th European Cystic Fibrosis Conference
Vienne, Austria

hal-01162769
https://hal-univ-rennes1.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01162769
DOI : 10.1016/S1569-1993(15)30217-4

Éditeur(s) : HAL CCSD Elsevier Masson
Résumé : National audience
The sources of exposure during diseases due to Aspergillus fungi in cystic fibrosis patients are still poorly explored. We assessed home fungal exposure in patients suffering from cystic fibrosis and analysed its impact on the presence of Aspergillus biological markers, the colonisation of airways, as well as the sensitization and Aspergillus serology. Between March 2012 and August 2012, 34 patients benefited from a visit performed by a home environment medical adviser including sampling for mycological analysis. The number of colonies of Aspergillus was not significantly different in the various sampling sites (P = 0.251), but the number of non-Aspergillus colonies was much higher in the kitchen (P = 0.0045). Subsequently, home fungal exposure was compared between the groups “absence of Aspergillus-related markers” and “presence of Aspergillus-related markers”. Home exposure to Aspergillus (P = 0.453) and non-Aspergillus (P = 0.972) flora was not significant between the 2 groups. Within this series of 34 patients that should be expanded, we note an absence of clear relationship between home exposure and the Aspergillus-linked markers in patients suffering from cystic fibrosis. This result should be taken into account regarding too restrictive hygiene advices provided to families, given the fact that fungal exposure can also results from activities performed away from home.
La source d’exposition au cours des pathologies aspergillaires du patient atteint de mucoviscidose reste encore peu explorée. Nous avons évalué l’exposition fongique domiciliaire chez des patients atteints de mucoviscidose, et analysé son impact sur la présence de marqueurs biologiques aspergillaires, colonisation des voies aériennes, ainsi que sensibilisation et sérologie anti-aspergillaire. Trente-quatre patients ont bénéficié d’une visite par un conseiller médical en environnement intérieur entre mars et août 2012, comprenant des prélèvements à visée mycologique. Le nombre de colonies aspergillaires ne différait pas significativement d’un site de prélèvement à l’autre (p = 0,251), mais le nombre de colonies non aspergillaires était significativement plus important dans la cuisine (p = 0,0045). L’exposition fongique domiciliaire a ensuite été comparée entre les groupes « marqueurs aspergillaires absents » et « marqueurs aspergillaires présents ». L’exposition domiciliaire à une flore aspergillaire (p = 0,453) et non aspergillaire (p = 0,972) ne différait pas significativement entre les 2 groupes. Sur cette série de 34 patients qui mérite d’être élargie, on note une absence de lien évident entre l’exposition domiciliaire et la pathologie aspergillaire. Ce résultat doit rendre prudent sur des conseils d’hygiène parfois très contraignants donnés aux familles, l’exposition fongique étant également importante dans le cadre des activités extra-domiciliaires.
ISSN: 1156-5233

hal-01158660
https://hal-univ-rennes1.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01158660
https://hal-univ-rennes1.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01158660/document
https://hal-univ-rennes1.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01158660/file/Exposition%20domiciliaire%20aux%20moisissures%20postprint%20MYCMED-S-14-00173.pdf
DOI : 10.1016/j.mycmed.2015.03.005