Éditeur(s) : HAL CCSD Springer Verlag
Résumé : International audience
PURPOSE: Dairy farming is a risk factor for the development of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We assessed the prevalence of farming-induced COPD (FI-COPD) using a new screening device, and we analyzed symptoms and occupational risk factors. METHODS: We performed on-site screening study of bronchial obstruction using an electronic mini-spirometer (EMS) on an entire population of dairy farmers (n = 147) from two villages in Brittany, France. Suspected bronchial obstruction (FEV1/FEV6 <0.8) was confirmed with standardized lung function tests (FEV1/FVC ≤0.7). We assessed past medical histories, respiratory symptoms, and occupational tasks of subjects with bronchial obstruction; asthmatics were defined as atopic and/or reversible; smoking-induced COPD patients were defined as non-reversible, non-atopic with smoking histories (≥5 PY); and FI-COPD patients were defined as non-reversible, non-atopic, and non-smokers. RESULTS: Using the EMS, 30.6% (n = 45) of dairy farmers were suspected of bronchial obstruction and underwent standardized spirometry. The FEV1/FEV6 ratio and FEV1/FVC ratio were in good agreement (r² = 0.66, P < 0.0001). The prevalence of confirmed bronchial obstruction was 9.5% (n = 14), which included 4 asthmatics, 3 smoking-induced COPD subjects, and 7 FI-COPD subjects. All the COPD patients were GOLD Stage II, and none were aware of their respiratory disease. Foddering duration was significantly higher in FI-COPD subjects compared with non-obstructive subjects, with 44 versus 17 min/day, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The EMS was a convenient mean of screening for bronchial obstruction, especially in on-site settings, and allowed us to diagnose FI-COPD in a non-spontaneously complaining dairy farmer population. Foddering was considered a significant risk factor.
ISSN: 0340-0131

hal-00872929
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00872929
DOI : 10.1007/s00420-011-0708-6
PUBMED : 21986906

Éditeur(s) : HAL CCSD Elsevier Masson
Résumé : National audience
INTRODUCTION:The AIRBAg study screens for bronchial obstruction in dairy farmers. We present the preliminary results after one year.METHODS:A prospective screening study based on questionnaires and electronic mini-spirometry (Néo-6(®)) that includes a representative sample of dairy farmers from the departments of Morbihan and Île-et-Vilaine in Brittany. The dairy farmers had an occupational medicine appointment and, if they demonstrated at least one marker of possible bronchial obstruction (chronic cough, chronic bronchitis, dyspnoea, wheezing, FEV1/FEV6<0.8), they were referred to a pulmonologist. The data we present here were extracted from the occupational medicine appointments because the pulmonologists' appointments are still running.RESULTS:Among the 277 dairy farmers included, 125 (45%) demonstrated "possible bronchial obstruction". The total score of the CAT questionnaire was higher in these farmers (9.1±6.2 versus 5.8±4.0; P<0.0001). In multivariate analysis markers of "possible bronchial obstruction" were eczema, manual foddering and duration of mechanical straw litter spreading.CONCLUSION:Occupational medicine appointments identified markers of "possible bronchial obstruction". We will have the complete results from AIRBAg study in 2015.
ISSN: 0761-8425

hal-01117944
https://hal-univ-rennes1.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01117944
DOI : 10.1016/j.rmr.2014.03.014
PUBMED : 25847201

Éditeur(s) : HAL CCSD
Résumé : International audience
Decreased frequency of pulmonary exacerbations, mainly related to immunomodulatory effects of macrolide antibiotics, has been demonstrated in bronchiectasis and chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (COPD). Due to its tolerance, azithromycin is the antibiotic of choice for maintenance therapy at the dose of 250 mg per day or 500 mg × 3 per week (for body weight extgreater55 kg). Maintenance therapy with macrolide could be proposed in selected patients with bronchiectasis or COPD with more than 3 acute exacerbations in the previous year or decreased lung function despite compliance with optimum treatment. The risk of sudden cardiac death with azithromycin is rare and controversial. It should be avoided in patients with a high baseline risk of cardiovascular disease, QT extgreater450 msec, pulse rate extgreater100 bpm and potential drug interactions, particularly those known to cause QT prolongation. It is recommended to search for hearing deficit (audiometry) and sputum culture positive for mycobacteria. Patients must also be aware that it can rapidly lead to macrolide resistance in commensal or pathogenic flora. Follow-up evaluation every 3 month can be proposed with medical history (hearing deficit) and electrocardiography. After one year, the treatment should be stopped in the absence of reduction in the frequency of exacerbations.
Presse Médicale (Paris, France: 1983)

hal-01063927
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01063927
DOI : 10.1016/j.lpm.2013.08.006

Éditeur(s) : HAL CCSD
Résumé : International audience
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the chronic respiratory disease with the most important burden on public health in terms of morbidity, mortality and health costs. For patients, COPD is a major source of disability because of dyspnea, restriction in daily activities, exacerbation, risk of chronic respiratory failure and extra-respiratory systemic organ disorders. The previous French Language Respiratory Society (SPLF) guidelines on COPD exacerbations were published in 2003. Using the GRADE methodology, the present document reviews the current knowledge on COPD exacerbation through 4 specific outlines: (1) epidemiology, (2) clinical evaluation, (3) therapeutic management and (4) prevention. Specific aspects of outpatients and inpatients care are discussed, especially regarding assessment of exacerbation severity and pharmacological approach.
Revue Des Maladies Respiratoires

hal-01560287
https://hal-univ-rennes1.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01560287
DOI : 10.1016/j.rmr.2017.03.034
PUBMED : 28552256

Éditeur(s) : HAL CCSD Paris, Masson et Cie
Résumé : National audience
Decreased frequency of pulmonary exacerbations, mainly related to immunomodulatory effects of macrolide antibiotics, has been demonstrated in bronchiectasis and chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (COPD). Due to its tolerance, azithromycin is the antibiotic of choice for maintenance therapy at the dose of 250 mg per day or 500 mg × 3 per week (for body weight >55 kg). Maintenance therapy with macrolide could be proposed in selected patients with bronchiectasis or COPD with more than 3 acute exacerbations in the previous year or decreased lung function despite compliance with optimum treatment. The risk of sudden cardiac death with azithromycin is rare and controversial. It should be avoided in patients with a high baseline risk of cardiovascular disease, QT>450 msec, pulse rate>100 bpm and potential drug interactions, particularly those known to cause QT prolongation. It is recommended to search for hearing deficit (audiometry) and sputum culture positive for mycobacteria. Patients must also be aware that it can rapidly lead to macrolide resistance in commensal or pathogenic flora. Follow-up evaluation every 3 month can be proposed with medical history (hearing deficit) and electrocardiography. After one year, the treatment should be stopped in the absence of reduction in the frequency of exacerbations.
Points essentielsLes macrolides administrés au long cours permettent, grâce en partie à leurs propriétés anti-inflammatoires, de diminuer la fréquence des exacerbations dans la DDB et la BPCO.Du fait de sa tolérance, l’azithromycine est le macrolide de choix, pouvant être utilisé à la dose de 250 mg/j ou 500 mg 3 fois par semaine chez les patients de plus de 55 kg.Un traitement par macrolides au long cours pourrait être proposé à des patients atteints de DDB ou de BPCO ayant eu plus de 3 exacerbations l’année précédente ou ayant une dégradation de leur fonction respiratoire malgré un traitement de fond bien conduit.Du fait d’un risque rare et controversé de mort subite d’origine cardiaque, il ne doit pas être proposé en cas de pathologie cardiovasculaire évoluée, d’intervalle QT > 450 ms, de traitement pouvant allonger l’intervalle QT, de tachycardie > 100/min.Il est recommandé de s’assurer de l’absence de troubles auditifs (audiogramme) et de mycobactérie atypique dans les cultures des expectorations. Les patients doivent aussi être informés du risque d’apparition de résistance aux macrolides de la flore commensale et pathogène.Une surveillance clinique, avec en particulier la recherche de troubles auditifs et électrocardiographique, peut être proposée tous les 3 mois. L’absence de diminution de la fréquence des exacerbations, lors du bilan annuel, justifie l’arrêt du traitement.
ISSN: 0032-7867

hal-01073027
https://hal-univ-rennes1.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01073027
DOI : 10.1016/j.lpm.2013.08.006
PUBMED : 24631048

Éditeur(s) : HAL CCSD Elsevier Masson
Résumé : International audience
The Société de pneumologie de langue française defines acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AE COPD) as an increase in daily respiratory symptoms, basically duration ≥ 48h or need for treatment adjustment. Etiology of EA COPD are mainly infectious, viral (rhinovirus, influenzae or parainfluenzae virus, coronavirus, adenovirus and respiratory syncytial virus) or bacterial (Haemophilus influenzae, Streptococcus pneumoniae, or Moraxella catarrhalis). Pollutant exposure can also lead to AE COPD, such as NO2, SO2, ozone or particulates (PM10 and PM2.5). In 30% the etiology remains unknown. Differential diagnoses of AE COPD include infectious pneumonia, pneumothorax, acute heart failure and pulmonary embolism. Presences of signs of severity impose hospitalization: signs of respiratory distress, shock, acute confusion but also fragile patients, insufficient home support or absence of response to initial treatment. AE COPD treatments consist on increase in bronchodilators, chest physiotherapy, and antibiotics if sputum is frankly purulent. Systemic corticosteroids should not be systematic.Recommended dose is 0.5 mg/kg on short course (7 days). During hospitalization, oxygen supplementation and thromboprophylaxis could be prescribed. The main interest in noninvasive ventilation is persistent hypercapnia despite optimal medical management. During ambulatory management or hospitalization, clinical assessment at 48-72h is mandatory. L’exacerbation aiguë de bronchopneumopathie chronique obstructive (EA BPCO) représente un événement important dans l’histoire naturelle de la BPCO, notamment en cas d’hospitalisation. Les EA BPCO interviennent dans la gravité et l’évolution de la BPCO ; et leur prévention est un des objectifs principal des traitements de fond.
La Société de pneumologie de langue française définie l’exacerbation aiguë de bronchopneumopathie chronique obstructive (EA BPCO) comme une majoration des symptômes respiratoires au-delà des variations quotidiennes, en pratique, d’une durée ≥ 48h ou justifiant une modification thérapeutique. L’étiologie de ces EA BPCO est principalement infectieuse, virale (rhinovirus, virus influenzae et parainfluenzae, coronavirus, adénovirus et virus respiratoire syncytial) ou bactérienne (principalement Haemophilus influenzae, Streptococcus pneumoniae et Moraxella catarrhalis). Elles peuvent également résulter de l’exposition à certains polluants comme le NO2, le SO2, l’ozone et la pollution particulaire (PM10 et PM2,5). L’étiologie reste indéterminée dans près de 30 % des cas. Les diagnostics différentiels des EA BPCO incluent les pneumopathies infectieuses, les pneumothorax, les poussées d’insuffisance cardiaque et les embolies pulmonaires. La présence de signes de gravité conditionnent l’hospitalisation : signes d’insuffisance respiratoire aiguë, de choc ou de défaillance neurologique, mais aussi en cas de patient fragile, d’absence de soutien familial à domicile ou d’absence de réponse au traitement initial. Le traitement d’une EA BPCO consiste en une majoration des bronchodilatateurs, une kinésithérapie respiratoire, une antibiothérapie en cas d’expectoration franchement purulente.La prescription de corticoïdes systémiques ne doit pas être systématique. La dose recommandée est de 0,5 mg/kg sur une courte période (7 jours). Lors d’une hospitalisation, une oxygénothérapie et une thromboprophylaxie peuvent être prescrite. La ventilation noninvasiveest principalement indiquée en cas de persistance d’une hypercapnie malgré un traitement médical optimal. Que le patient soit pris en charge en ambulatoire ou en hospitalisation, une réévaluation clinique à 48-72h est indispensable.
ISSN: 0755-4982

hal-01117949
https://hal-univ-rennes1.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01117949
https://hal-univ-rennes1.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01117949/document
https://hal-univ-rennes1.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01117949/file/Prise%20en%20charge%20des%20exacerbations_accepted.pdf
DOI : 10.1016/j.jeurea.2015.02.002

Éditeur(s) : HAL CCSD
Résumé : International audience
BACKGROUND: There is no recommendation for treating pulmonary hypertension (PH) when associated with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of PH-specific therapy in patients with COPD. METHODS: All successive patients with severe PH [mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) ≥35 mm Hg] and COPD, who received specific PH medication and who underwent right heart catheterization at baseline and after 3-12 months of treatment, were analyzed from a prospective database. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients were included with a median follow-up of 14 months. Mean forced expiratory volume in 1 s was 57 ± 20% of predicted, and mean forced expiratory volume in 1 s/forced vital capacity was 47 ± 12%. Dyspnea was New York Health Association classification stage (NYHA) II in 15%, NYHA III in 81% and NYHA IV in 4%. First-line treatments were endothelin receptor antagonists in 11 patients, phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors in 11 patients, calcium blocker in 1 patient, combination therapy in 3 patients including 2 with a prostanoid. After 6 ± 3 months, pulmonary vascular resistance decreased from 8.5 ± 3 to 6.6 ± 2 Wood units (p extless 0.001), with significant improvement of cardiac index from 2.44 ± 0.43 to 2.68 ± 0.63 liters × min × m-2 (p = 0.015) and mPAP from 48 ± 9 to 42 ± 10 mm Hg (p = 0.008). There was no significant difference in dyspnea, 6-min walking distance, echocardiographic parameters or N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide levels. There was no significant difference in arterial oxygen saturation after 3-12 months of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Specific PH medications may improve hemodynamic parameters in COPD patients with severe PH. Appropriate prospective randomized studies are needed to evaluate the potential long-term clinical benefit of treatment
Respiration; International Review of Thoracic Diseases

hal-01239807
https://hal-univ-rennes1.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01239807
DOI : 10.1159/000431380
PUBMED : 26277885

Éditeur(s) : HAL CCSD Public Library of Science
Résumé : International audience
The CoPanFlu-France cohort of households was set up in 2009 to study the risk factors for infection by the pandemic influenza virus (H1N1pdm) in the French general population. The authors developed an integrative data-driven approach to identify individual, collective and environmental factors associated with the post-seasonal serological H1N1pdm geometric mean titer, and derived a nested case-control analysis to identify risk factors for infection during the first season. This analysis included 1377 subjects (601 households). The GMT for the general population was 47.1 (95% confidence interval (CI): 45.1, 49.2). According to a multivariable analysis, pandemic vaccination, seasonal vaccination in 2009, recent history of influenza-like illness, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, social contacts at school and use of public transports by the local population were associated with a higher GMT, whereas history of smoking was associated with a lower GMT. Additionally, young age at inclusion and risk perception of exposure to the virus at work were identified as possible risk factors, whereas presence of an air humidifier in the living room was a possible protective factor. These findings will be interpreted in light of the longitudinal analyses of this ongoing cohort.
ISSN: 1932-6203

Droits : http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/
hal-01122215
https://hal-univ-rennes1.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01122215
https://hal-univ-rennes1.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01122215/document
https://hal-univ-rennes1.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01122215/file/journal.pone.0060127.pdf
PUBMED : 23613718

Éditeur(s) : HAL CCSD European Respiratory Society
Résumé : International audience
There are conflicting data regarding the magnitude and determinants of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) risk in farmers.In a cross-sectional study of 917 nonfarming working controls and 3787 farmers aged 40-75 years, we assessed respiratory symptoms, tobacco exposure, job history (without direct exposure measurement) and lung function. COPD was defined by the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) criterion (post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1)/forced vital capacity (FVC) extless0.70) and by the Quanjer reference equation (post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC extlesslower limit of normal (LLN)).The prevalence (95% CI) of COPD according to the GOLD criterion was 5.1% (4.4-5.8%) and 2.9% (1.8-4.0%) in farmers and controls, respectively (p=0.005), and 3.1% (2.5-3.6%) and 1.5% (0.7-2.3%), respectively, for the LLN criterion (p extless0.01). For both COPD criteria after adjustment for age, sex and smoking status, COPD prevalence was similar in controls and crop farmers. Compared to controls, four job categories had a higher prevalence of COPD according to the GOLD criterion, namely, cattle breeders, swine breeders, poultry breeders and breeders of two or more livestock types. Among cattle breeders, only those from Franche-Comté had higher prevalence of COPD according to both GOLD and LLN criteria.The prevalence of COPD in farmers is higher than in nonfarming working controls, and depends on the farming activity, the region and the criterion used to define COPD
ISSN: 0903-1936

hal-01216204
https://hal-univ-rennes1.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01216204
DOI : 10.1183/13993003.00153-2015
PUBMED : 26453630